Church bells announce a fire in the photo lab.
"Cultural Studies" is soon there with his buckets.
"Egg Roll" watches from the sidelines.
"Weather-Beaten Skeleton" can do nothing.
Do you want a piece of me?
Have you read Stones of Venice?
The stones appear there as themselves.
Those rains brought these muds.
Your tone is excessive, they said.
But it was what I was saying they hated.
They didn't like my insistence.
They didn't like me.
Those over-cautious bells, afraid to ring out the changes.
Or was it a problem with the entire system?
***
I admire the poetry of Michael Palmer very much, but it is not the kind of poetry I would write. I like more humor, more spoken language, and more directness. What I do in these poems, then, is to erase his and write mine on top of them, leaving nothing of the original except for a few "trace" words. I couldn't do this with a poet whose poems I would want to write, nor with a poet who holds no attraction for me at all. For some reason I cannot write out of myself, only in reaction to something already there. I fear the explanation is otiose, because if it is more interesting than the poem, it sinks it right there, but if it is less interesting, who needs it?
I've never been able to get past TS Elliot and Seamus Heaney in English-language poetry. I love them both passionately, but with anybody who came after them I'm hopeless.
ResponderEliminarHeaney is still alive so nobody really comes "after" him. You are missing out on a lot of poetry, but maybe it's just not your métier. I think the same about Galdós. No Spanish novelist afterwords comes even close.
ResponderEliminarLike.
ResponderEliminarMP's been cutting loose a little the last couple books. Your "piece of me / Stones of Venice" couplet is pretty funny and could conceivably be smuggled into an MP poem.
I guess my question is whether I should cut these loose from the MP reference and present them as wholly my own?
ResponderEliminar