Email me at jmayhew at ku dot edu
"The very existence of poetry should make us laugh. What is it all about? What is it for?"
“El subtítulo ‘Modelo para armar’ podría llevar a creer que las
diferentes partes del relato, separadas por blancos, se proponen como piezas permutables.”
Amen. Now if only bookstores could get that right. . . .And, by the way, right-on on Belitt. "Quiero llorar. . . " is just so beautiful, it's a shame what happens to it.
i know. this used to drive me freaking batty when i worked at the bookstores. i'd insist on putting him in the right place (along with other Spanish and Chinese authors, etc.) , and then nobody could find them, so we'd HAVE to put them back wrong. sigh. (not the case at b&n where i was not allowed to change them because then even the employees couldn't find anything.)i think even the reference book entries i did for "contemporary authors" (gale publishers) were edited to be wrong with the same reasoning! i'd have to check again to be sure. was about a dozen yrs ago.
But, Jonathan, I've often wondered why on this blog you refer to the man as "Lorca" rather than "Garcia Lorca" (e.g, "the correct way to list Lorca"). I didn't want to seem trivial so I never asked.
Lorca is known as "Lorca" in the Spanish speaking world. You can say "García Lorca" too. If you use the first name you have to put in the complete nameFederico García Lorcanot*Federico Lorca García is like "Smith." It is the most common surname in Spain--hence not too distinctive. Lorca is very uncommon. Thus the emphasis shifts to the maternal surname. The same thing happens with Pérez Galdós who is known as "Galdós" rather than "Pérez." So in these cases the actual accepted usage in the Hispanic world mirrors the "incorrect" treatment of the name by the English speaker. Very confusing.
Yes, very cofusing...bur very interesting. Thanks.
Publicar un comentario