Email me at jmayhew at ku dot edu
"The very existence of poetry should make us laugh. What is it all about? What is it for?"
--Kenneth Koch
“El subtítulo ‘Modelo para armar’ podría llevar a creer que las
diferentes partes del relato, separadas por blancos, se proponen como piezas permutables.”
Páginas
▼
5 ene 2006
My post about a poetry that did not rely on "hooks" was quoted here as a piece of "PA philosophy." Let me make it clear that I was just expressing a personal interest in this poetic goal, but that a lot what goes by the-term-that-we must-revile-and-kill-off does in fact rely on such hooks, and quite explicitly. For example, Deer Head Nation is a book I admire a lot, but it does not correspond at all to my idea of a poetry that refuses identifiable "points of entry."
PA and P-A is also completely OUT. Let's not code the bullshit term. It is meaningless, it must go, no codes necessary. It is the 6th of January 2006 / It is 2:22 in New York / GOODBYE!!
ResponderEliminarxxxjimmy
I wouldn't have had to even refer to it by name or abbreviation, but I was incorrectly identified as providing philosophical statemet of "PA" principles on one of those discussion boards and had to set the record straight.
ResponderEliminar