Email me at jmayhew at ku dot edu 
"The very existence of poetry should make us laugh.  What is it all about?  What is it for?" 
 
--Kenneth Koch  
“El subtítulo ‘Modelo para armar’ podría llevar a creer que las
diferentes partes del relato, separadas por blancos, se proponen como piezas permutables.”
21 jul 2005
Hot eclecticism at {lime tree}.  I guess my reaction is Yes!  The jazz analogy works great.  I remember reading a Sharon Olds poem in one of the BAPS and thinking:  this isn't so bad.  In other words, I didn't think it was the poetic equivalent of Kenny G.  (For the record Kenny G=Billy Colllins.)  I didn't have to stretch too far to see Olds as a legitimate poet who just happens to be on the other side of an aribtrary and artificial socio-political division. That's what Jordan was saying too.  Whereas other SoQ poets make me think:  no, this division is real and tangible.  I agree with Kasey about the contextualization, with one caveat.  Sometimes the divisions are misleading.  For example, why is Denise Levertov acceptable whereas Ammons is not, in certain circles?  Is it a difference in their poetry, or in the social groupettos to which they belong?   
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
 
 
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario