One more thing: one of the respondents on the Pound question, Daniel Someone-Or-Other, quotes as his source a book by Eustace Mullins on Pound. Now Mullins was someone attracted to Pound because of his anti-Semitism and Fascism--not in spite of it. Mullins was or is a notorious neo-Nazi conspiracy theorist who would rant on and on about the Rothchilds and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. So when Mullins argues that Pound was not anti-Semitic, what exactly is going on? I can see how someone could pick up Mullins' book and not know who the author is, and not read carefully enough to realize what the real agenda is here.